![]() |
||||
![]() | ||||
Your answers indicate that you believe the impulses that drive human action are beyond our internal control, and the mere presence of certain physical characteristics is likely to result in or determine criminality. This is known as biological determinism. Various theories of this kind have existed for well over a century. | ||||
![]() | ||||
Epilepsy was once believed to be a sure sign of criminality. There have been theorists who tried to explain criminal behavior by analyzing overall body type, by focusing on the appearance of the face, and by mapping the bumps on the surface of the skull. The physical dimensions considered "normal" have traditionally been those of white Europeans, which of course led to criminal perceptions of people who didn't fit the category. | ||||
| ||||
![]() |
||||
While the more extreme examples of these theories may sound silly and outdated, some forms of biological determinism are still with us today. The belief that our parents pass along genetic material that makes us behave in certain ways isn't unpopular. In the U.S., issues of race figure prominently in criminal justice debates. The disproportionate number of African-Americans in the criminal justice system has confirmed or suggested, for some, that blacks are prone to crime simply because of their race. As we map the human genome, many are sure we will find a "criminal" gene. | ||||
There are many other theories that have evolved over time. Would you like to see a few more? |